The Use of CTPA in Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism during Pregnancy and Puerperium Period: A 5 Year- retrospective Study at a Regional Referral Hospital in Malaysia

Lai Yuan Xin *

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia.

Hii Yong Hui

Department of Radiology, Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia.

Zarina Mohamed

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia.

Rozita Mohd Ghazali

Department of Radiology, Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia.

Aruku Naidu Apana

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Introduction: The cumulative incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) in South Asia is 1.03 per 10 000 pregnancies with maternal mortality rate of 11.1%. Given the morbidity and mortality of undiagnosed PE in pregnancy, the threshold to perform computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is low due to the fear of missing the diagnosis of PE. Often the pre-test clinical scores are bypassed especially the modified Well score (MWS), which is widely used in the general population yet not validated in pregnant women. The objectives of our studies were:

  1. To assess CTPA ordering trend and its positive rate
  2. To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MWS in predicting PE in pregnancy
  3. To identify the rate of contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) post CTPA

Study Design: It was a retrospective study which included all pregnant and postpartum patients who underwent CTPA for suspected PE in Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, Malaysia from Jan 2018 to December 2022. A total of 185 CTPA results were retrieved and MWS were calculated retrospectively:  ≤ 4 (unlikely PE) or >4 (likely PE).

Results: The positive rate of CTPA was 20/185 (10.5%). From 185 patients, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predicate value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of MWS were 90%, 14.5%, 11.3%, and 92.3% respectively, in predicting PE. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed a non-discriminating value (0.5). 7.1% of patients had CA-AKI post-CTPA.

Conclusion: The trend of using CTPA in diagnosing PE in pregnant women had been steady despite our finding of its low diagnostic yield. Although Modified Wells score is widely used in the general population, its implications for pregnant patients are still a matter of debate.

Keywords: CTPA, modified wells score, pulmonary embolism, venous thromboembolism


How to Cite

Xin, Lai Yuan, Hii Yong Hui, Zarina Mohamed, Rozita Mohd Ghazali, and Aruku Naidu Apana. 2024. “The Use of CTPA in Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism During Pregnancy and Puerperium Period: A 5 Year- Retrospective Study at a Regional Referral Hospital in Malaysia”. Asian Research Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 7 (1):135-44. https://journalarjgo.com/index.php/ARJGO/article/view/220.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cantwell R, Clutton-Brock T, Cooper G, Dawson A, Drife J, Garrod D, Harper A, Hulbert D, Lucas S, McClure J et al. Saving mothers’ lives: Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–2008. The Eighth Report of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG. 2011;118(Suppl. 1):1–203.

Heit JA, Kobbervig CE, James AH, Petterson TM, Bailey KR, Melton LJ, 3rd. Trends in the incidence of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or postpartum: A 30-year population-based study. Ann. Intern. Med. 2005;143:697–706.

Tan TC, Goh CMY, Tan SSX, Tan LK, Yang Y, Lee LH. Epidemiology of pregnancy-associated pulmonary embolism in South Asian multi-ethnic country: Mortality trends over the last four decades. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021; 47(1):174-183. DOI:10.1111/jog.14450

Rotzinger DC, Dunet V, Ilic V, Hugli OW, Meuli RA, Schmidt S. Pulmonary embolism during pregnancy: a 17-year single-center retrospective MDCT pulmonary angiography study. Eur Radiol. 2020 Mar;30(3):1780- 1789.

Lazarus E, Debenedectis C, North D, Spencer PK, Mayo-Smith WW. Utilization of imaging in pregnant patients: 10-year review of 5270 examinations in 3285 patients—1997–2006. Radiology. 2009; 251:517–24.

Costantino MM, Randall G, Gosselin M, Brandt M, Spinning K, Vegas CD. CT angiography in the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolus. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(2):471-474. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2552

Dalen JE, Waterbrook AL. Why are nearly all CT pulmonary angiograms for suspected pulmonary embolism negative? Am J Medicine. 2017;130:247–8.

Douma RA, le Gal G, Söhne M, et al. Potential of an age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off value to improve the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in older patients: A retrospective analysis of three large cohorts. BMJ. 2010;340:c1475.

Van Belle A, Büller HR, Huisman MV, et al. Christopher study investigators. Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing and computed tomography. JAMA. 2006;295(2):172-179.

Penaloza A, Verschuren F, Meyer G, et al. Comparison of the unstructured clinical gestalt, the Wells Score, and the revised Geneva score to estimate pretest probability for suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;62:117-124.

Low C, Kow R, Abd Aziz A, et al. Diagnostic Yield of CT Pulmonary Angiogram in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism and Its Predictive Factors. Cureus. 2023;15(6):e40484. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40484

Prevedello, Luciano M et al. Does clinical decision support reduce unwarranted variation in yield of CT pulmonary angiogram? The American Journal of Medicine. 2013;126(11):975-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.04.018

Medson K, Yu J, Liwenborg L, Lindholm P, Westerlund E. Comparing clinical hunch against clinical decision support systems (PERC rule, wells score, revised Geneva score and YEARS criteria) in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. BMC Pulm Med. 2022;22(1):432. DOI: 10.1186/s12890-022-02242-1

Ceriani E, Combescure C, Le Gal G, et al. Clinical prediction rules for pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(5): 957-970. DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03801.x

Wang RC, Bent S, Weber E, Neilson J, Smith-Bindman R, Fahimi J. The impact of clinical decision rules on computed tomography use and yield for pulmonary embolism: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2016;67(6):693-701.e3.

Robert-Ebadi H, Elias A, Sanchez O, Le Moigne E, Schmidt J, Le Gall C, et al. Assessing the clinical probability of pulmonary embolism during pregnancy: The pregnancy-adapted Geneva (PAG) score. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2021;19 (12):3044–3050.

Van der Pol LM, Tromeur C, Bistervels IM, Ni Ainle F, van Bemmel T, Bertoletti L, et al. Pregnancy- adapted YEARS algorithm for diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1139– 49.

Murphy N, Broadhurst DI, Khashan AS, Gilligan O, Kenny LC, O'Donoghue K. Gestation-specific D-dimer reference ranges: A cross-sectional study. BJOG. 2015;122(3):395-400. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12855

Pinheiro Mde B, Junqueira DR, Coelho FF, et al. D-dimer in preeclampsia: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Chim Acta. 2012;414:166-170. DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.08.003

Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135(2):98-107. DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-135-2-200107170-00010

O’Connor C, Moriarty J, Walsh J, Murray J, Coulter-Smith S, Boyd W. The application of a clinical risk stratification score may reduce unnecessary investigations for pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24: 1461–4.

Cutts BA, Tran HA, Merriman E, Nandurkar D, Soo G, DasGupta D, et al. The utility of the wells clinical prediction model and ventilation-perfusion scanning for pulmonary embolism diagnosis in pregnancy. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2014;25(4):375–8.

Parilla BV, Fournogerakis R, Archer A, Sulo S, Laurent L, Lee P, et al. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: Are biomarkers and clinical predictive models useful? AJP Rep. 2016;6(2):e160–4.

Raji, Hanieh et al. Overuse and underuse of pulmonary CT angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2018;32:3. DOI:10.14196/mjiri.32.3

Crichlow A, Cuker A, Mills AM. Overuse of computed tomography pulmonary angiography in the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19(11):1219-1226. DOI:10.1111/acem.12012

Kaur J, Singh H. Maternal Health in Malaysia: A review. Webmed Central Public Health. 2011;2: WMC002598. Available:https:// doi.org/10.9754/journal.wmc.2011.002598

Ministry of Health Malaysia. Prevention & treatment of thromboembolism in pregnancy and puerperium a training Manual; 2018.

Kline JA, Richardson DM, Than MP, Penaloza A, Roy PM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of pregnant patients investigated for suspected pulmonary embolism in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21(9):949-959. DOI: 10.1111/acem.12471

Servante J, Swallow G, Thornton JG, et al. Haemostatic and thrombo-embolic complications in pregnant women with COVID-19: A systematic review and critical analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):108. Published 2021 Feb 5.

DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03568-0

Touhami O, Marzouk SB, Bennasr L, et al. Are the wells score and the revised geneva score valuable for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in pregnancy? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;221: 166-171.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.12.049

Askary E, Poordast T, Shiravani Z, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) manifestations during pregnancy in all three trimesters: A case series. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2021;19(2): 191-204. Published 2021 Feb 21. DOI: 10.18502/ijrm.v19i2.8477

Leclercq MG, Kruip MJ, Mac Gillavry MR, Van Marwijk Kooy M, Büller HR. Observer variability in the assessment of clinical probability in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2004;2 (7):1204-1206.

Testuz A, Le Gal G, Righini M, Bounameaux H, Perrier A. Influence of specific alternative diagnoses on the probability of pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost. 2006;95(6):958-962. DOI: 10.1160/TH06-02-0114

Ministry of health, clinical practice guideline: Prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism; 2013.

(Kooiman J, Klok FA, Mos IC, et al. Incidence and predictors of contrast-induced nephropathy following CT-angiography for clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(2): 409-411. DOI:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03698.x