A Rare Case of Misplaced Copper - T in Appendix Along with Appendicitis

Vidhya Raghavan *

Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Dhiraj General Hospital, S.B.K.S. MI & RC, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth University, Pipariya, Vadodara, India.

Rakesh Anand

Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Director PG Studies, Dhiraj General Hospital, S.B.K.S. MI & RC, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth University, Pipariya, Vadodara, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Uterine perforation is one of the serious complications associated with the use of Intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUD). Perforation can occur during insertion or later. Delayed onset of symptoms is mostly due to chronic inflammatory reaction of copper-containing IUD. Presenting a 28 year old woman with pain over right iliac fossa since 6 months with misplaced copper T which had penetrated into the tip of appendix. Appendectomy was done and copper T was retrieved. The impacted copper T had caused local inflammatory changes leading to appendicitis. Patients with IUD should be alerted about the possibility of its migration. Regular self examination for “missing threads” is useful in the early detection of migration of IUDs. The treatment of a migrated IUD is surgical, either laparoscopy or laparotomy. Withdrawal of the migrated IUD is advisable even if its migration has not given rise to any clinical symptoms.

Keywords: IUCD, appendicitis, migration, `, perforation


How to Cite

Raghavan , V., & Anand , R. (2023). A Rare Case of Misplaced Copper - T in Appendix Along with Appendicitis . Asian Research Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 6(1), 116–120. Retrieved from https://journalarjgo.com/index.php/ARJGO/article/view/177


References

Farouk K, Uddin Afridi Z, Farooq MA, Qureshi IA. Urological complications of intrauterine contraceptive device. Journal of Postgraduate Medical Institute. 2007;21(4).

Bhatnagars MI. A Field Study of IUCD Acceptors in the State of UP. New Delhi: National Institute of Health and Family Welfare; 1988.

Schaap B. IUD acceptance in rural madhya-pradesh-results of an acceptors interview. Journal of Family Welfare. 1993;39(1):52-5.

Heinberg EM, McCoy TW, Pasic R. The perforated intrauterine device: endoscopic retrieval. JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 2008; 12(1):97.

Zakin D, Stern WZ, Rosenblatt R. Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. I. Classification, complications, mechanism, incidence, and missing string. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1981;36:335–353.

Ohana E, Sheiner E, Leron E, Mazor M. Appendix perforation by an intrauterine contraceptive device. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2000;88:129–131.

Thomalla JV. Perforation of urinary bladder by intrauterine device. Urology. 1986; 27(3):260-4.

Berman MC, Cohen HL. Diagnostic Medical Sonography. Obstetrics and gynaecology: A guide to clinical practice. Lippincott. 1997;569–571.

Goldman JA, Peleg D, Feldberg D, Dicker D, Samuel N. IUD appendicitis. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1983;15(3):181-3.

Singhal SR, Marwah DS, Paul A, Singhal SK. Missed intra uterine device: a rare indication for appendicectomy-case report with review of literature. East and Central African Journal of Surgery. 2010; 15(2):156-8.

Coelho JC, Gonçalves CG, Graf CM. Laparoscopic treatment of peri-appendicitis caused by intrauterine contraceptive device. Arquivos de Gastroenterologia. 2003;40(1):45-6.